Google Places and Local Search – Messy, Messy, Messy

As mentioned in a previous post on local search, I’ve been working with a client who needs to improve their local search results. I’m trying to document the process in the hopes it might be helpful to other small businesses who find themselves in a similar situation.

Step One – What Is Going On Here!?
When I started looking into my client’s local listings, I saw two things that concerned me (beyond just the fact that the client wasn’t ranking well in local and should be):

  • a listing with an address and phone number that were no longer accurate for this business because they had closed that location
  • more importantly – a lot of map spam

Dealing with the ‘extra’ listing is time-consuming but relatively straightforward. I can do a search on the ‘old’ phone number and correct (or at least attempt to correct) it in all the places it appears online. Notwithstanding the sadly not-so-occasional site that’s impossible to update, the steps to correct the problem are pretty clear: register (if the client hasn’t already), claim the listing(s), and delete or modify the outdated one.

But… What About the Rest of This Mess?
I know Google’s been on a mission to clean up map spam, but there’s obviously still a way to go. For this particular client, there are competitors using a slight variation of his actual business name, competitors who have multiple listings, and completely off-topic listings in the Places results.

There are listings with no reviews and just a Places page (no website) that outrank him for some search terms. There are listings with incomplete Places profiles and a non-local 877 phone number that outrank him!

One of his more aggressive competitors outranks him with a link to a site that has nothing to do with the service they provide. (It’s a Little League site.)

Beyond the Places Results
And this illogical mess extends beyond just Places. In the organic results on a search for the exact <business name city state> of that aggressive competitor, a listing on Bloglines is in the #1 position! The only reasonable explanation for that is a review said competitor did on Merchant Circle that shows up on the Bloglines profile. Why that justifies a top ranking is beyond me.

Interestingly, the #2 and the #3 listings for that search <competitor business name city state> are also from Merchant Circle. The #4 listing is my client (?) and #5 is the actual business’ website. So that means I was so specific as to type the exact name of the business and the city and state, and the site I was looking for shows up at #5!

Taking a look at a search for my client’s exact <business name city state>. In the Places results, a one-pack shows up, featuring the Little League listing connected to his competitor mentioned above! This may be because Google Places has somehow conflated an outdated listing for my client (who is no longer at the address provided) with something else, because the address on this listing is my client’s old one.

In the natural results, my client shows up at #1. (Phew!!!)

What I’m Doing to Clear This Up
Though I’m always a little ambivalent about ‘reporting’ other sites, in this case I don’t really see any alternative. The Places information is so messed up that Google clearly needs some help to straighten it out. So, I’m reporting a problem on the local listings that are inaccurate; I’m not too optimistic that they’ll resolve the issue quickly, but it’s the best I can do for right now.

Here’s how to report a problem with a Google Places listing:

  1. Go to the Places listing
  2. Scroll down to the bottom of the page
  3. Click on Report a Problem
  4. A popup appears for you to identify what the problem is
  5. You should explain the problem as clearly (and briefly) as possible in the Comments box
  6. I’d recommend choosing the option to be emailed when the problem is reviewed so you’ll know when (if) that happens.

I’m also working to build up more citations for my client.

Finally, I’m working to focus their attention on getting reviews on Google. Now that Google has stopped pulling in reviews from third-party sources like Yelp and TripAdviser, it’s important to encourage satisfied customers to leave reviews directly in Places.

Google – Please Get Places Fixed!
I know Google has been struggling to keep up with all the confusion and outright spam in Places, and I give them credit for trying. That said, the usefulness of these local listings is obviously dependent upon them being correct. Accuracy becomes even more important when you consider that these results may be showing up for someone using a mobile device while trying to find a certain business; it’s very frustrating to show up at the correct address and discover the business you want isn’t there.

Of course, I’m well aware that I’m not the only Internet marketer venting my frustration about this. Catalyst eMarketing did a post on MAJOR Google Places problems back in March. did a great overview of a recent Places review scam that impacted hundreds of moving companies across the U.S.

One hope is that, like with the J.C Penney link-buying shcme and the review-quality-not-important issue, perhaps now that the New York Times has written an article about mapspam for locksmith listings, Google will get it together and finally make the Places results relevant again.

At least one can hope.

Still Using the Yellow Pages?

I recently came across a really great search marketing article with useful information for local search over at Search Engine Land. The data came from comScore studies commissioned by TMP Directional Marketing comparing this year with last.

The important bits for small business owners wondering ‘how will customers find me?’:

  • The percentage of people using the print yellow pages as their ‘primary’ source to find location business information has declined roughly 2% in the past year, from 33% to 30%.
  • In 2008, search engines surpassed the YP, with 31% of respondents using them as their primary source.
  • Including Internet Yellow Pages and local search sites, the Internet was the choice of over 60% of respondents.

But there’s more good news for local search too. A very high percentage of local searchers follow up with some offline activity:

  • 34% do an in-store visit following a local search, and 29% do so after visiting the Internet Yellow Pages.
  • 38% of local searches are followed by a phone call. And over 50% of Internet Yellow Page searches result in a call.

What Is This Information Telling You?
If you’re a local business looking for local customers, you simply can’t afford to NOT include the Internet as part of your marketing plan. The days of being able to place an ad in the print yellow pages and forget it are over.

Google Local Search – May We Help You Find What You’re Looking For?

David Mihm does a typically fantastic job of explaining the importance of local search in his ‘Ranking in the Local Search Algorithms‘ presentation from the SEMpdx Hot Seat on September 9. (Don’t be frightened by that ‘algorightms’ word; the presentation is really accessible and clear, not a bunch of techno-speak.)

Particularly noteworthy right up front is the extrapolation that:

Half a BILLION unique visitors per month search Google with ‘local intent’.

(Still don’t think local search is important, dear reader?) [Read more...]

Creating an Effective Local Search Profile

In the previous post, we discussed why it’s important for local companies doing business with local customers to have a local search profile. In this post, we’ll examine the how of putting together an effective profile.

While the process and the profile itself are fairly straightforward, it’s important to consider a number of underlying factors that can affect your placement within the local search results:
[Read more...]